Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GroupSequence validation_groups capability doc #8522

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2017

Conversation

damienalexandre
Copy link
Contributor

When using form types without object, we often define constraints in the form itself.

I missed a way to use the sequential groups without object, but already implemented, so here is the documentation for it 😋

Cheers.

Copy link
Member

@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice and useful. @damienalexandre thanks for this!

Copy link
Member

@lyrixx lyrixx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Little note: use statement are not alpha sorted)

@weaverryan
Copy link
Member

Thanks Damien!

@weaverryan weaverryan merged commit 9eb4b11 into symfony:2.7 Oct 29, 2017
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2017
…ienalexandre, javiereguiluz)

This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.

Discussion
----------

Add GroupSequence validation_groups capability doc

When using form types without object, we often define constraints in the form itself.

I missed a way to use the sequential groups without object, but already implemented, so here is the documentation for it 😋

Cheers.

Commits
-------

9eb4b11 Minor syntax issues
39f9143 Fix code-block
6ad18f2 Add GroupSequence validation_groups capability doc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants